Influence of calcium ferrite characteristics on metallurgical properties of high basicity sinter
-
摘要: 烧结矿中主要粘结相矿物铁酸钙的含量、形态、结晶粒度等特征对烧结矿质量起着关键性作用。采用偏光显微镜对不同质量的现场高碱度烧结矿的矿相结构及铁酸钙特征进行了系统定量研究。结果表明：两种烧结矿金属相均以赤铁矿和磁铁矿为主，黏结相均为铁酸钙、硅酸二钙和玻璃质。不同之处是1#烧结矿以针状铁酸钙交织赤铁矿、磁铁矿形成的交织熔蚀结构为主；2#烧结矿以他形粒状磁铁矿与粘结相矿物相互结合形成的粒状结构为主。1#烧结矿中铁酸钙体积分数约为50%，形态多为针状，粒度范围主要为0.05～0.10 mm；对应的烧结矿还原性（75%）、低温还原粉化率（76.5%）和转鼓强度(81.6%)均良好。2#烧结矿中铁酸钙体积分数约为45%，形态多为板状、柱状，粒度范围主要为0.05～0.10 mm；对应的烧结矿还原性（59.35%）较弱、低温还原粉化率（25.21%）较低和转鼓强度(63.37%)较小。Abstract: The content, morphology and grain size of calcium ferrite, and the main binding mineral as well in sinter, play a key role in the quality of sinter. The mineral phase structure and calcium ferrite characteristics of high basicity sinter with different quality situation were studied systematically and quantitatively by using polarized light microscope. The results show that hematite and magnetite are the main metal phases of No.1 and No.2 sinter. The bonding phases are calcium ferrite, dicalcium silicate and vitreous. The difference is that the No.1sinter is mainly composed of interlacing corrosion structure formed by acicular calcium ferrite and magnetite. The No.2 sinter is dominated by granular structure formed by the mutual combination of allochthonous magnetite and binding mineral. The volume percentage of calcium ferrite in No.1 sinter is about 50%, and its shape is mostly needle shaped. The size range of diameter is 0.05~0.10mm. The corresponding sinter reducibility (75%), low temperature reduction degradation rate (76.5%) and drum strength (81.6%) show high values. The volume fraction of calcium ferrite in the No.2 sinter is about 45%, and its shape is mostly plate and column. The size range of its diameter is 0.05~0.10mm. The corresponding sinter reducibility (59.35%) is weak, the low temperature reduction degradation rate (25.21%) is low, and the drum strength (63.37%) is small.
-
表 1 现场烧结矿主要化学成分
Table 1. Main chemical compositions of used sinter
% 编号 TFe FeO SiO2 CaO MgO Al2O3 TiO2 1# 55.1 8.7 5.42 11.28 2.83 2.48 0.12 2# 56.7 8.5 4.87 10.1 1.91 0.46 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 烧结矿的矿物组成及含量
Table 2. Mineral compositions and contents of sinter
% 编号 赤铁矿 磁铁矿 铁酸钙 硅酸二钙 玻璃质 残余CaO 硫化物 1# 30～40 15～20 45～50 5～10 少量 微量 2# 8～10 35～40 45～50 5～7 少量 ±1 微量
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 烧结矿的冶金性能
Table 3. Metallurgical properties of sinter
% 编号 还原性 转鼓指数 低温还原粉化率 1#烧结矿 75.00 81.60 76.50 2#烧结矿 59.35 63.37 25.21
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] （郭兴敏. 烧结过程铁酸钙生成及其矿物学[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2004.）Guo Xingmin. Study on formation of calcium ferrite and its mineralogy in sintering process[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2004. [2] Han Xiuli, Si Tianhang, Li Mingduo,et al. Influences of MgO and Al2O3 on the mineralogical properties of calcium ferrite in iron ore sinter[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2020,27(5):280−290. (韩秀丽, 司天航, 李鸣铎, 等. 镁铝对烧结矿中铁酸钙的矿物学特性影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2020,27(5):280−290. [3] （吴奇. 烧结矿粘结相的微观组织结构与烧结矿质量的相关规律研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2008.）Wu Qi. Research on related regulation between sinter bond-phase microstructure and sinter quality[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2008. [4] Guo Xingmin, Zhu Li, Li Qiang, et al. Mineralogical composition and microstructure of high basicity sinters[J]. Iron & Steel, 2007,42(1):17−19. (郭兴敏, 朱利, 李强, 等. 高碱度烧结矿的矿物组成与矿相结构特征[J]. 钢铁, 2007,42(1):17−19. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0449-749X.2007.01.004 [5] Liu Lina, Han Xiuli, Liu Lei. Study on texture of sinter with different basicity[J]. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium, 2017,38(2):112−115. (刘丽娜, 韩秀丽, 刘磊. 不同类型烧结矿随碱度变化的矿相结构研究[J]. 钢铁钒钛, 2017,38(2):112−115. doi: 10.7513/j.issn.1004-7638.2017.02.019 [6] Jiang Minning. Tangshan iron and steel company limited high basicity sinter production practice[J]. China Steel Focus, 2020,(3):2, 120. (蒋民宁. 唐钢炼铁厂高碱度烧结矿生产实践[J]. 冶金管理, 2020,(3):2, 120. [7] （宏济. 烧结矿中铁酸钙的还原粉化机理[N]. 世界金属导报, 2018-07-03(B02).）Hong Ji. Reduction degradation mechanism of calcium ferrite in sinter[N]. World Metal, 2018-07-03(B02). [8] Guo Lanfen, Wang Jinlong, Liu Xiaoming, et al. Research on factors affecting the sinter low-temperature reduction powder index[J]. Henan Metallurgy, 2019,27(5):15−19, 42. (郭兰芬, 王金龙, 刘晓明, 等. 烧结矿低温还原粉化指标影响因素的研究[J]. 河南冶金, 2019,27(5):15−19, 42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3129.2019.05.006 [9] Bai Yongqiang, Cheng Shusen, Zhao Hongbo,et al. Study of V-Ti sinter reduction degradation by mineralogical analysis[J]. Sintering and Pelletizing, 2011,36(2):1−6. (白永强, 程树森, 赵宏博, 等. 钒钛烧结矿还原粉化过程的矿相分析[J]. 烧结球团, 2011,36(2):1−6. [10] Han Tao. Microstructure research and practice based of improving reducibility of sinter in Xuan steel[J]. Sintering and Pelletizing, 2018,43(6):49−53, 58. (韩涛. 提升宣钢烧结矿还原性的微结构研究与实践[J]. 烧结球团, 2018,43(6):49−53, 58. [11] Bai Dongdong, Han Xiuli, Li Changcun,et al. Influence of mineral structure of vanadium-titanium sinter on its metallurgical properties[J]. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium, 2018,39(5):111−115. (白冬冬, 韩秀丽, 李昌存, 等. 钒钛烧结矿矿相结构对其冶金性能的影响[J]. 钢铁钒钛, 2018,39(5):111−115. [12] Fan Xiaohui, Li Wenqi, Gan Ming,et al. Influence and mechanism of MgO on strength of high basicity sinter[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2012,43(9):3325−3330. (范晓慧, 李文琦, 甘敏, 等. MgO对高碱度烧结矿强度的影响及机理[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,43(9):3325−3330. [13] （张忍德. 重钢高澳矿配比下混合料烧结行为研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2014.）Zhang Rende. Sinter behavior of blends with highproportion of australian ores in Chongqing iron and steel company[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2014. [14] （杨光亮. 原料组成和烧结工艺参数对烧结矿相结构及强度的影响研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2006.）Yang Guangliang. Study the influence raw composition and sinter craft parameter on sinter phase structure and strength[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2006. [15] Wang Tianxiong, Ding Chengyi, Lü Xuewei. Influence of theoretical liquid phase of sinter materials on the quality indexes of sinter[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2016,28(9):28−33. (王天雄, 丁成义, 吕学伟. 烧结原料理论液相量对烧结矿质量的影响[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2016,28(9):28−33. -
点击查看大图
图(4) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 234
- HTML全文浏览量: 14
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0
